Category: Gardasil Vaccine Injury
HPV vaccine recommendations not as strong as previously thought

The controversy surrounding the safety and efficacy of the HPV vaccines are not the only issues parents and physicians struggle with when it comes to recommending it for their children.  A survey conducted by Pediatrics, the journal for the American Academy of Pediatrics, uncovered a range of attitudes among physicians related to administering the HPV vaccine to female adolescents. Forty two percent of pediatricians and 54 percent of family physicians considered it necessary to discuss sexuality before recommending HPV vaccine, though few physicians thought that vaccination would encourage earlier or riskier sexual behavior among teens.  Parent opposition to HPV vaccination for moral or religious reasons was perceived as definitely or somewhat a barrier by 23 percent of pediatricians and 33 percent of family physicians.

References:

Click here to vist Pediatrics

Daley, M., et al. Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Practices: Survey of US Physicians 18 Months After Licensure, Pediatrics, Published online August 2, 2010

OBJECTIVES The goals were to assess, in a nationally representative network of pediatricians and family physicians, (1) human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination practices, (2) perceived barriers to vaccination, and (3) factors associated with whether physicians strongly recommended HPV vaccine to 11- to 12-year-old female patients.

METHODS In January through March 2008, a survey was administered to 429 pediatricians and 419 family physicians.

RESULTS Response rates were 81% for pediatricians and 79% for family physicians. Ninety-eight percent of pediatricians and 88% of family physicians were administering HPV vaccine in their offices (P < .001). Among those physicians, fewer strongly recommended HPV vaccination for 11- to 12-year-old female patients than for older female patients (pediatricians: 57% for 11- to 12-year-old girls and 90% for 13- to 15-year-old girls; P < .001; family physicians: 50% and 86%, respectively; P < .001). The most-frequently reported barriers to HPV vaccination were financial, including vaccine costs and insurance coverage. Factors associated with not strongly recommending HPV vaccine to 11- to 12-year-old female patients included considering it necessary to discuss sexuality before recommending HPV vaccine (risk ratio: 1.27 [95% confidence interval: 1.07–1.51]) and reporting more vaccine refusals among parents of younger versus older adolescents (risk ratio: 2.09 [95% confidence interval: 1.66–2.81]).

CONCLUSIONS Eighteen months after licensure, the vast majority of pediatricians and family physicians reported offering HPV vaccine. Fewer physicians strongly recommended the vaccine for younger adolescents than for older adolescents, and physicians reported financial obstacles to vaccination.

Key Words: human papillomavirus vaccine • physicians • attitudes • practices • survey

Abbreviations: HPV = human papillomavirus

 
HPV vaccination linked to cervical cancer in those already infected

If you are already infected with HPV the risk of getting precancerous lesions/cancer may increase between 30% and 44.6% after HPV vaccination according to Merck’s own briefing document submitted to the FDA in 2006  [click here to read].  The Merck sponsored clinical study 13 exposed 156 people to Gardasil and 137 to a placebo who tested positive for one of the strains of HPV contained in the vaccine.  The results showed 31 of the 156 people exposed to Gardasil developed cervical cancer as opposed to only 19 in the placebo group. Since study 13 there have been at least 278 reports of cervical cancer post-vaccination.

Read more ...
 
HPV vaccine kills 16-year-old girl lawsuit alleges

A lawsuit filed in the U.S. Federal Court of Claims this week alleges that the HPV vaccine Gardasil caused the death of a 16-year-old Missouri girl. Gardasil is a vaccine used to prevent the transmission of a sexually transmitted disease called human papillomavirus (HPV). Controversy regarding the safety of Gardasil surrounded the vaccine since its FDA approval in 2006 and continues to be the subject of intense debate.

Read more ...
 

Contact Us | Vaccine Injury Compensation Program | Help for Gardasil Injury | Vaccine Brain Damage

Copying text from this site is prohibited by copyright law.
Please note that you are not considered a client until
you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us. Prior
results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Law Offices of Sadaka Associates represents vaccine injury clients in vaccine injury lawsuits nationwide, including Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming. We also serve the cities of New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Phoenix, Philadelphia, San Antonio, San Diego, Dallas, San Jose City, Detroit, Jacksonville, Indianapolis, San Francisco, Columbus, Austin, Memphis, Fort Worth, Baltimore, Charlotte, Boston, Seattle, Washington, Milwaukee, Denver, Louisville, Las Vegas, Nashville, Oklahoma City, Portland, Tucson, Albuquerque, Atlanta, Long Beach, Fresno, Sacramento, Mesa, Kansas City, Cleveland, Virginia Beach, Omaha, Miami, Oakland, Tulsa, Honolulu, Minneapolis, Colorado Springs, Arlington and Wichita.
__________________________________
Law Offices of Sadaka Associates LLC
20 North Van Brunt Street
Englewood, NJ 07631
Phone: 201-266-5670 Fax: 201-266-5671